Versions Compared

Old Version 195

changes.mady.by.user Gunnar Andersson

Saved on

compared with

New Version 196

changes.mady.by.user Philippe Robin

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand

Backlog

  • Android Compatibility Definition Document
  • Software architectural task force : Vehicle Data architecture for Android
  • Comparison of how vehicle properties are managed by Android 9 and 10 (Q) - further inputs
  • question to address in the group: what do participating companies intend to do with the JAPI (Java API similar to CommonAPI for Android) ? this building block is currently missing
  • Signal to service translation
  • Secure access control in Some/IP

Tuesday 3 August – 5:00 PM CEST

  • Bittium and Tieto participants are back from vacation
  • Stefan delivers a recap on the plan for the demo for the upcoming AMM
  • then Stefan and Alex discuss the translation from vehicle properties from VSS
  • eventually Philippe asks Bittium people to consider a possible contribution to the demo or the tests of the demo, to be discussed further in the upcoming calls

Tuesday 6 July – 5:00 PM CEST

  • AMM dates are set for first week (4→8 October).  Location, likely Germany and virtual hybrid.
  • Tools.  Alignment process ongoing (which creates some open PRs and issues in VSS and vss-tools before that)

...

  • Alex: we are using Apollo graphql server which needs an addition for web token management, and other stuff we are working on, I have discussed which contribution we could do with Markus
  • BMW has the blue box on the right box (authentication) (look at the EDS architecture diagram)
  • BMW has only the EDS implementation, not the Internal Data Server one
  • Alex: the permissions are not yet what we need
  • discussion on the work to do for the authentication and the access control groups
  • Gunnar: we need to do a more formal description of things to be done for the authentication
  • Alex: might be able to do some work in the next days, will try out my ideas on an actual implementation, as soon as I have something (next week possibly), I will generate some docs like ppt
  • Alex: tooling is not clear for me yet, as soon as we agree on the way to specify things, we will talk about tooling and manifest generation
  • discussion on the naming of artefacts
  • Alex: we want to have a nodeJS graphql implementation running
  • Alex: I can describe the nodeJS and graphql installation and the deployment of json files
  • Gunnar: the wiki page for documenting tihs is AASIG: Implementation notes
  • /TODO/ Alex to describe the nodeJS and graphql installation in the above wiki page
  • Stefan: at Alex, since you have the authentication implementation under way, could you spent some time to describe what you have done so that we can identify the leftovers ?
  • Alex: I can explain that, for instance we need a json web token implementation
  • /TODO/ Alex & Stefan to clarify what could be the contribution of BMW & Tieto to the authentication mechanism implementation

...