Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Publish v2

Published Documents

       AVPS Specification, version 2.0 (PDF)


Want to know more?

(blue star)  Look at parent page and follow the references from the main project page.


...

Next Version (work in progress)

(star)  The official working location is <new online version to be created> to enable collaborative editing.
Feel free to read the latest, but please engage with the project before proposing changes directly in the document.


Older versions

(tick)  AVPS Specification, version 1-01 (PDF)

Automotive Virtual Platform Specification

1. Introduction

Automotive requirements lead to particular choices and needs from the underlying software stack.  Existing standards for device drivers in virtualization need to be augmented because they are often not focused on automotive or even embedded, systems.  Much of the progression comes from the IT/server consolidation and in the Linux world, some come from virtualization of workstation/desktop systems.

A collection of virtual device driver APIs constitute the defined interface between virtual machines and the virtualization layer, i.e. the hypervisor or virtualization "host system".  Together they make up a definition of a virtual platform.  

This has a number of advantages:

  • Device drivers (for paravirtualization) for the kernel (Linux in particular), don't need to be maintained uniquely for different hypervisors.
  • Some potential for shared device driver implementation also across non-Linux operating systems
  • Ability to move hypervisor guests between different hypervisor environments
  • Potential for shared understanding, requirements and test-suites for different implementations of the virtual platform.
  • Some potential for shared device driver implementation across hypervisors with different license models

In comparison, the OCI initiatives for containers serves a similar purpose.  There are many compatible container runtimes → can we have standardized "hypervisor runtime environment" that allows a standards compliant virtual (guest) machine to run.

  • Hypervisors can fulfil the specification (with local optimizations / advantages)
  • Similarly, this specification is what guests can be engineered to.

2. Architecture

Assumptions made about the architecture, use-cases...

Limits to applicability, etc...

3. General requirements

Automotive requirements to be met (general)...

3. Common Virtual Device categories

3.1 Block Device

3.1.1 Standard Serial Device

(lightbulb) REQ-1:   Requirement according to chapter x.y in [VIRTIO].

3.2 Network Device

...

4. Supplemental Virtual Device categories

4.1 9pfs and host-to-vm filesystem sharing

    <insert results about where to use and our conclusion that it has little applicability in automotive>

3. References

...