Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Adding a few missed things to the minutes

...

  • Gunnar Andersson
  • Artem Mygaiev
  • Bernhard Rill
  • Christian Schulenberg
  • Dmitry Morozov
  • Franz Walkembach
  • Kai Lampka
  • Matt Spencer
  • Philippe Robin

Minutes

  • Last week's meeting review. Franz: RISC-V consortium and GENIVI board cooperation should be discussed. Gunnar sees no issue in trying new hardware architecture in the technical project, and GENIVI organization is generally hardware-independent.  Gunnar requests appropriate contact (from Franz), especially if someone works on Virtualization technologies.
  • Participation. No updates from Green Hills regarding a new participant → We have not reached out to our contacts, Philippe will do it.   Anup has a conflict on this time slot but wants to participate via email.  Gunnar proposes to

...

  • shift the meeting

...

  • (some of the time, not all of the time), for Anup, but also (maybe a different shift) to allow people from the US

...

  • to participate.
  • SEL2.
    • Bernard: API specification (alpha revision) is about to be released. It will be accessible only under NDA. Artem proposes to create an internal review team.
    • Bernard could invite colleagues  to discuss SBSA (possibility to join in two weeks or so).
  • Draft specification. Gunnar:

...

  • Last week I felt we did not have full agreement on what we want to achieve. The project description I will show later is one input to that discussion.
  • Come up with ideas for tech presentations for AMM meeting in Munich (May 14-16). Two weeks deadline has been proposed.
  • PV IO interface by Xen as an alternative to VirtIO. Artem proposes the topic for discussion. No documents with description so far. Artem is to share related links.
  • Reviewing Virtual Device Categories table. No progress. We need to clarify VM responsibilities. 

  • Also we need to convince people from OEMs to participate. We need requirements in general regarding usage of hypervisors in automotive.

    • Gunnar agrees, but proposes that we also know fairly well (as suppliers) the generalized use-cases and needs on a high level.  It is unfortunate but should not make us stop completely.
  • From interest to participation. Gunnar introduces the Project description: a high level idea of requirements and respective solutions. OCI as an example. Everyone is welcome to read and give some feedback. Franz asks about the list of VMs (OSes) we want to support. Gunnar: Any OSes

...

  • that are in the scope of automotive industry (for example Linux (multiple variations), Android, QNX, INTEGRITY, AUTOSAR Adaptive).

January 22, 2018

Participants:

...