This contains meeting minutes. If meetings are cancelled this would be noted here. Some dates are missing minutes but ideas are always captured on the main project pages here.
December 11, 2018
Participants:
- Kai Lampka (Elektrobit)
- Alex Agizim (EPAM)
- Kamalakkannan Natar... (Bosch)
- Anup Patel (XVisor)
- Dmitry Morozov (OpenSynergy)
- Philippe (GENIVI)
- Gunnar (GENIVI)
- Matt Spencer (ARM)
- Vasco Fachin (Bosch)
Notes from HV meeting 2018-12-11
Gunnar: Did you perform the action to decide on support (or not) for SCMI-for-sensors proposal?
... SCMI being discussed in OpenSynergy
Dmitry: ...comppany working to form an opinion, will come back.
Dmitry: It seems to be more features on backends side clocks and power domains
...Is SCMI an appropriate protocol
Gunnar: Yes, the specification itself highlights those features. The proposal that this will be repurposed as a standard sensors API is the new idea.
Kai: Not so much focus on that right now
Kai: feedback and a review should be possible
Alex: ... need to give feedback
Alex - noo need for input because EPAM
Gunnar: SCMI - more comments?
Matt: I'd rather have Bernhard comment on it.
Vasco: I need to look into this. Kind of a new topic.
Gunnar: Still open question for me is Intel suppt? I'd consider contacting ACRN project as a start.
Matt: I'd like to think that it can be adopted by Intel, will check if we have had any feedback.
Will check with Bernhard Rill.
Virtualization spec
Dmitry's input:
SHALL/MUST Reuse definitions from VIRTIO
Gunnar: I notice a mix of terms here.
Dmitry: Yes, shall and must are the same thing.
MUST seems to be used as positive and SHALL NOT used as negative (in VIRTIO)
Discussion with Kai on block device
Some features might not be covered by VIRTIO in enough detail.
Kai: trim command is worthwhile to describe.
Gunnar: OK can we then try this as a start - describe trim command in
detail, specification, could be requirements... It should be concrete -
we're writing a specification...
Gunnar: I want to get the AGL review off the backlog, it's been open long
enough. Please read the paper, figure out what is useful / not useful in
the context we are working. Just like source code we should reuse already
done work.... (Just like others may reuse what we produce in the virt
platform spec).
Gunnar: More from backlog - the architecture & requirements work thread has stopped because of lack of input and previous driver Sriram is busy.
Gunnar: Have you looked at this within Bosch? Vasco?
Vasco: I will consider this
- Architecture
- Use case
- Requirements
Gunnar: You can address it from any angle you like of the above 3, it will lead to the kind of results we mean here.
Action (all): AGL paper read through (again), see links
December 4, 2018
Participants:
- Kai Lampka (Elektrobit)
- Kamalakkannan Natar... (Bosch)
- Anup Patel (XVisor)
- Dmitry Morozov (OpenSynergy)
- Philippe
- Gunnar
- Bernhard Rill (ARM)
...