GET INVOLVED

COVESA Getting Started

COVESA Community Calendar - Weekly Meeting Schedule

COVESA Communication Channels (Slack, Mailing Lists, Calendar)

COVESA Github Repository

Project Launch Process

Request Wiki Account

Join COVESA

COVESA Briefing/Overview Deck


COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS

Data Expert Group
▶︎ Best Practices
     ▷ Governance
     ▷ Privacy and Identity
     ▷ Data Model Definition
     ▷ API First
▶︎ Data Models and Ontologies
     ▷ Vehicle Signal Specification (VSS)
     ▷ Vehicle Signal Specification Ontology (VSSo) - W3C Collaboration
▶︎ Architecture and Infrastructure
▶︎ Interface Definition
     ▷ Vehicle API
     ▷ Vehicle Service Catalog (VSC)
     ▷ Vehicle Information Service Specification (VISS) - W3C Collaboration
 
Data Expert Group Workshop 2023Q1

Electric Vehicle Charging Expert Group
▶︎ EV Charging Event Data Aggregation Project
▶︎ EV Optimization - Increase Travel Range for Fixed Battery

Android™ Automotive SIG
▶︎ Android Automotive White Label App Store

Security Team

Simulation and Tooling
▶︎ digital.auto

Vehicle Experience and Content - Entertainment BoF
▶︎ In-vehicle Payment SIG

HISTORICAL

Common Vehicle Interface Initiative

Cloud & Connected Services Project

SDV Telemetry Project - On Hold

Events

Industry Events

Industry Events 2023

COVESA Events

October 2022 All Member Meeting

April 2022 All Member Meeting

October 2021 All Member Meeting

May 2021 All Member Meeting

October 2020 All Member Meeting

May 2020 Virtual Technical Summit

November 2019 Technical Summit

May 2019 All Member Meeting

Contact Us

Child pages
  • CVII Tech Stack technologies - Protobuf

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: moved data format comparison link to list of useful links

...

  • As a means to define an efficient binary serialization format
  • As a means to reuse code-generators for skeleton-code to work with VSS data in various languages.

Alternatives:

Useful links:


Concerns

  • How to decide on groups of parts
  • You have to provide all sub-branches even if only interested in one leaf - especially where a branch has both sub-branches and leaves, this is unexpected.
  • Some groups make sense always, e.g. GPS.{Lat,Long}
  • optionality is supported in Protobuf.  Should all branches/leaves even be optional in the message definition?

...