JOIN/SIGN UP
Already a Member? |
GET INVOLVED
Understanding and Engaging in COVESA Expert Groups & Projects |
COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS
HISTORICAL
SDV Telemetry Project - On Hold |
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using this site, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. |
COVESA provides the same opportunities for project and repository creation to all COVESA Members. There are no rules to exclude any potential Member Contributors from proposing projects or repositories.
Projects and their associated work product, discussions, meetings, plans, and repositories are open, public and easily accessible.
Repositories must belong to a group or project. Projects must belong to Expert Groups or Birds of a Feather groups. See COVESA Organization Structure for detail.
Collaboration between multiple organizations is critical to the success of COVESA. Repositories are intended to be collaborative with multiple contributors from multiple organizations.
The process of repository creation is intended to be lightweight and be aligned with its associated group/project. Hence, communication is key.
ACTION ITEM: Need a repository proposal template.
Review is done by the related Expert Group or Birds of a Feather Group and the Project in a timely fashion (< 2 weeks). Group Chairs and Project Leads with Community Director coordinate the review.
Once the repository proposal has been reviewed and agreed by the relevant parties, the repository can be created and populated.
Source (Google Slides) for above flowchart
Projects and associated repositories will be in one of four phases: Proposal, Incubation, Mature, or Archived.
Project is being proposed to COVESA. Project has not started in COVESA.
A project may move to incubation with Creation Review described above.
Project is establishing itself in COVESA working toward solid working code, stable APIs, establishing a community, multi-organization contributions, meeting milestones and release and establishing open source practices.
A project may request a Maturity review to transition the Mature Phase when it can provide documentation that it has solid working code, stable APIs, establishing a community, multi-organization contributions, meeting milestones and release and establishing open source practices.
Project has established good open source practices, has regular predictable releases, multi-organization contributors, supports developers, adopters and users.
Projects will be actively reviewed every quarter. Projects with no recent contributions, no active maintainers, no meetings, vulnerabilities that have not been addressed and no other signs of activity will be marked as Status: Pending Archive. An issue titled Pending Archive asking for a response from maintainers or for new maintainers will be posted. If no answer within 6 months the project status will be changed Status: Archived.
Project has reached its logical conclusion, is not being contributed to or used