Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Which topic in the matrix will you provide resources to?
  • Which topics are still missing?
  • Are the already existing proposed (sub) projects appropriate for you?
    • Is there any hindrance for you to participate in those existing proposed projects (GENIVI, W3C participation)
  • Which (new) sub-project meeting will your company start and lead?
  • Which parts (sub-trees in the hierarchy) of the standard data / services catalog will you provide input to?
  • Which technologies would you like to propose in the "agreed-upon" technology stack?
  • How can we start discussing your internal structure (organizational/technical) to understand how the CVII best supports it?  
    • E.g.:  Which standards do you use today?
    •         Where is it realistic to introduce the new standards?
    •         Where (in your particular system) shall there be translation between legacy/proprietary and the new standards?
  • Will your company further support the development of these types of activities by joining GENIVI and/or W3C?


Partial Reply RB GmbH

  • Which topic in the matrix will you provide resources to?

    CATALOGDevelop main Standard Data Catalog
    (META)MODELDefine standard Data model Rule Set / meta-model
    ALIGNMENTAlign with SENSORIS
  • Which topics are still missing?
    • Not completely "missinigmissing", but "SerivcesServices/RPC" are an important point, Currently (VSC) alsmot almost nothing, and not clear how it will "tie into" VSS without reinventing the wheel (sic!)
    • In terms of ARA:: Com there are two perfectly matching mechanisms => Events and Methods => IMHO VSS is the perfect base for that discussion
    • Kind of reference implementation (partly covered by kuksa.val) but whole stack is missing
    • Would a CVI Dev Kit help?
  • Are the already existing proposed (sub) projects appropriate for you?
    • VSS development project, W3C VISSv2
    • Is there any hindrance for you to participate in those existing proposed projects (GENIVI, W3C participation)
      • not a W3C member yet
  • Which technologies would you like to propose in the "agreed-upon" technology stack?
    • a more "binary" representation of requests in transport protocls protocols instead of JSON (e.g CBOR, protobuf...)
    • best practive practice how to extend/widen/leverage VSS data model to a fully semantic digtial digital twin for knwledge knowledge engineering in backend
    • DDS, MQTT, D-BUS, DAPR.IO, ...


...


 [ ] Ted Guild Can you help out to link to W3C meeting information.  In particular I could only write "bi-weekly" but that does not specify exactly when.  A link to wiki or mailing list where invites are sent, will help.

...