Monday, August 19
Participants
- Gerald Spreitz
- Kevin Valdek
- Michael Ger
- Steve Crumb
- Don Dulchinos
- Guru
- Stephen
- Benjamin Klotz
Minutes
- Kevin Valdek opened the meeting and welcomed participants.
- Discussing the organization of the gap analysis document...
- Kevin has produced an outline proposal in VCS-48.
- Gunnar has put some ideas into a wiki page
- How do we slice the document. One chapter per compared (data model) covering all characteristics, or one chapter per characteristics/topic covering all data models.
- some discussion, no obvious conclusion - but let's write an outline for clearer proposal we can decide on.
- SC: I would like to see a motivation chapter (for the GENIVI deliverable itself) to clarify document purpose and organization to the reader.
- Gunnar: Seems like we need to rework this a bit with the given input.
- Kevin: I volunteer to propose a (new, detailed) outline of the document
- Kevin will rework the Wiki page that Gunnar started on (because it is now kind of obsolete).
- Gerald: I can report on my action (VCS-28). Yes, overall we think CCC digital key is not much in scope. About car data, they are apparently not planning to create a data model / data taxonomy.
- Gunnar: OK so their main deliverable is requirements, or a design and a programming API? If a programming API, there can be some similarity between an API and a data exchange model, so I would at least take some look (for overlap) if it is an API.
- Gerald: ... yes it seems mostly requirements, use-cases, ... maybe more. I can check a bit more.
- Kevin/Gunnar: We should include them (any organization that falls a bit out of scope) in the report nonetheless, just to document that we have analyzed them and drawn a conclusion.
- Gunnar: Let's go through the JIRA tickets so we don't miss anything
- Kevin: I can do that, I will display...
- VCS 25 - Gerald: I sent a mail to Sensoris chairman about a joint meeting. No answer, need to retry this.
- VCS-50 - (W3C workshop) Steve Crumb: Yes it is confirmed that GENIVI will present the project on the W3C workshop
- VCS-2 This is Philippe's ticket and looks like a kind of overview tracking ticket (An Epic, sort of)
- VCS-33 - (SENSORIS vs VSS) Still open only because the presentation has not been published in the Wiki (Benjamin was reminded)
- VCS-25, Guru working on it. Keep it open.
- VCS-34 - Sensoris vs CVIM. We think we can close the ticket. Overlaps other analysis.
- VCS-38 - Steve Crumb: I have an update. I contacted ANSI via helpdesk. They require us a site license ($1200) to get the specification and we must put limits on the individuals that may read it. How many of you can get your own access via your organization?
- Kevin: I can read the ExVe document.
- Gerald and Guru: Also we can do that.
- ...BMW? (Benjamin can't go on audio, but we assume it ought to be accessible – follow up)
- SC: GENIVI might purchase it only for staff since the limited circulation requirement will in that case not allow us to distribute to the members. Steve will investigate this.
- VCS-39. Kuksa. Gerald will contact Sebastian to see status
- VCS-42. Automat Security analysis. Gunnar: I will try to make sure it is presented to the security meeting this Thursday, as requested. We assume this ticket stays open until then.
- VCS-47. Don: This is on track. I am talking to OCF tomorrow.
- Kevin: Any other business?
- Meeting adjourned
Monday, August 12
Participants
- Kevin Valdek (High Mobility)
- Gerald Spreitz (Bosch)
- Don Dulcino Dulchinos (eonti)
- Gunnar (GENIVI)
- Philippe Robin (GENIVI)
...
{"serverDuration": 255, "requestCorrelationId": "0a36682ce49a0e1d"}