Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Monday, October 7

Participants

  • Kevin
  • Don (OCF)
  • Gunnar
  • Philippe
  • Steve (partial)

Apologies

  • Guru
  • Benjamin
  • Gerald
  • Daniel

Agenda

  • GENIVI technical summit - content planning, additional information
  • https://grpc.io/: is this relevant for CCS ?
  • Gap analysis deliverable - review feedback of draft sections on VSS, Sensoris, etc.
  • Design concerns wiki page - more feedback
  • Sprint & backlog review (end of Sprint 4)
  • Enterprise data value: new topic to be added to the project scope
  • AOB

Minutes

  • GENIVI technical summit - content planning, additional information
    • registration link is at https://www.eventleaf.com/TechSummit19ent
    • content will be finalized this week, 3 tracks are planned: Connected Services, Android Automotive, Cybersecurity
    • quick poll on who will attend
  • https://grpc.io/: is this relevant for CCS ?
    • g stands for Google
    • Gunnar: we look at Google rpc in the GPRO project when we did the survey on communication protocols, look at the list of technologies we looked at and the GPRO white paper
    • grprc is built on http2 which never took off, people are rather working on http3, gprc is likely well suited on web technologies, it is one of many choices that are out there
    • from my perspective, it is relevant but not more relevant than anything else, when it comes to protocols that are not REST oriented protocols, MQTT has more relevance
  • SAREF
    • Benjamin reviewed the paper presented at the W3C workshop on data models for transportation, his findings are here
    • use cases identified in the paper are
    • Philippe: these use cases fit well into the the future, i.e. much beyond a 5-year horizon
    • Philippe: IMHO currently in the CCS project,  short term is represented by current high mobility offering on the market, and the on-going work is rather looking at the mid-term,
    • Kevin: it would be good to ask OEMs what use cases are more tangible to implement
  • >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  • Gap analysis deliverable - review feedback of draft sections on VSS, Sensoris, etc.
  • review status
    Kevin: review the draft document on VSS from Gunnar
    the intro is not specific to VSS but fairly general
    G. agreed
    review work on the VSS stuff asked again
  • G. will review the sensoris written by guru
  • open group/fairly similar to ocf
    TODO don hahve a looj at it
  • cvim benjamin Kevin on the
    ask kevin about his credentials

Monday, September 30

Participants

  • Ondrej (OCF Cloud Services)
  • Kevin
  • Guru
  • Keith
  • Gerald
  • Don (OCF)
  • Steve
  • Gunnar
  • Philippe

...

  • Sensoris
    • Gerald has contacted the project chairman
    • timeslot proposed on Thu 29/8 at 8:30am for a sync call (expected participants: Gerald (call moderator), Gunnar, Philippe, Benjamin),
      Jira
      serverJIRA
      serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
      keyVCS-49
      updated and closed
    • Philippe will send an invite once the timeslot is confirmed by Sensoris chairman has confirmed the timeslot
  • discussion on the draft content of the gap analysis deliverable prepared by Kevin: GAP Gap analysis draft deliverable
  • discussion on whether to include CVIM in the gap analysis, even though the results of Automat have not been exploited by OEMs which participated to the Automat project
    • consensus seems to be there are some good stuff in CVIM that is worth appearing in the gap analysis
  • Kevin, Gerald, Gunnar will start populating the deliverable in the wiki
  • report from Don on OCF automotive
    • Don was not able to sync with OCF staff as expected
    • Don showed a slide deck about working mode with GENIVI
  • next week agenda: backlog and sprint review
  • misc. Benjamin's slide deck on his findings on CVIM are available there
  • Adjourned: 17:05

...