Versions Compared

Old Version 12

changes.mady.by.user Gunnar Andersson

Saved on

compared with

New Version 13

changes.mady.by.user Sebastian Schildt

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

AREASHORT NAME

SUB-PROJECT

DETAILS

INFORMATION / MARKETING / DISSEMINATION
All-hands information & sync. meetingTBD
HIGH-LEVEL ORGANIZATIONSteering committee (?)TBD
INFORMATION / MARKETING / DISSEMINATIONInformational webinars

(green star) Webinar planned with Automotive World, in November.

Additional - please propose.

ALIGNMENTCompany-specific alignments
(see details below)		Need individual one-on-one between GENIVI-W3C and companies

HIGH-LEVEL ORGANIZATION


(NEW) Which other companies (e.g. OEM, Tier1, or other) and Organizations should we talk to, according to you?

(E.g. Which others are you already working with, or comfortable to collaborate with in this area?)


Vehicle Data


AREASHORT NAME

SUB-PROJECT
DETAILS

CATALOGDevelop main Standard Data Catalog

VSS development project (tick)

(META)MODELDefine standard Data model Rule Set / meta-model

VSS development project (tick)

ALIGNMENTAlign with SENSORIS(warning) Separate continuation meeting needs to be booked
ALIGNMENTAlign with JASPAR(warning) Separate startup meeting needs to be booked
ALIGNMENTAlign with ISO Extended Vehicle(warning) Separate startup meeting needs to be booked
ALIGNMENT

other orgs.  VDA?  ASAM? MONET? ...

ISO smart city, ISO intelligent transport systems, ISO open geospatial consortium,


TECHNOLOGY STACK
VSS to AUTOSAR translator

tbd


TECHNOLOGY STACKVISS v2

W3C Automotive Working Group (tick)

TECHNOLOGY STACKOther alternatives for data transfer protocol

GENIVI CCS Project (tick) project could be used for this

ALIGNMENTVSS in AUTOSARTODO
ALIGNMENTCompany-specific alignments
(see details below)		Need individual one-on-one between GENIVI-W3C and companies

...

  • Which topic in the matrix will you provide resources to?
  • Which topics are still missing?
  • Are the already existing proposed (sub) projects appropriate for you?
    • Is there any hindrance for you to participate in those existing proposed projects (GENIVI, W3C participation)
  • Which (new) sub-project meeting will your company start and lead?
  • Which parts (sub-trees in the hierarchy) of the standard data / services catalog will you provide input to?
  • Which technologies would you like to propose in the "agreed-upon" technology stack?
  • How can we start discussing your internal structure (organizational/technical) to understand how the CVII best supports it?  
    • E.g.:  Which standards do you use today?
    •         Where is it realistic to introduce the new standards?
    •         Where (in your particular system) shall there be translation between legacy/proprietary and the new standards?
  • Will your company further support the development of these types of activities by joining GENIVI and/or W3C?


Partial Reply RB GmbH

  • Which topics are still missing?
    • Not completely "missinig", but "Serivces/RPC" are an important point, Currently (VSC) alsmot nothing, and not clear how it will "tie into" VSS without reinventing the wheel (sic!)
  • Are the already existing proposed (sub) projects appropriate for you?
    • VSS development project, W3C VISSv2
    • Is there any hindrance for you to participate in those existing proposed projects (GENIVI, W3C participation)
      • not a W3C member yet
  • Which technologies would you like to propose in the "agreed-upon" technology stack?
    • a more "binary" representation of requests in transport protocls instead of JSON (e.g CBOR, protobuf...)
    • best practive how to extend/widen/leverage VSS data model to a fully semantic digtial twin for knwledge engineering in backend


...


 [ ] Ted Guild Can you help out to link to W3C meeting information.  In particular I could only write "bi-weekly" but that does not specify exactly when.  A link to wiki or mailing list where invites are sent, will help.

...