Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Some correction to minutes

...

  • Call with Sensoris
    • very good and friendly atmosphere in the call
    • Porkop Prokop seems to be quite open for a coordination discussion
    • He gave a rough overview od Sensoris including business cases and system architecture, business cases are OEM-related and do not intend to provide an open access to the vehicle
    • Sensoris objective is to describe what the car is sensing for the world surrounding it, e.g. number of lanes, road works, traffic signals, outside temperatue (as part of a data set called climate, temperature and weather)
    • Gunnar: VSS rather describes (was described by Prokop as...) focusing more on the in-vehicle data , we and SensorIS more on modeling the outside world that the car drives through.  We have not been through to compare the data models during the call , but there seems to be is some overlap in some areas but not in other like map-related data and data with a location-based focus
    • Gunnar: license License - Sensoris do not want derivatives, there are the permit derivatives (Using CC-BY-ND).   It could be interpreted as they are only body that can launch Sensoris specs, they but also means that flexible reuse is difficult.  They propose openess to anyone who wants to change the SensorIS spec.  
    • Unknown: "This and this is the way they work with Japanese projects"
    • Gunnar: Sensoris welcome any proposal that would make their data model more complete, but this proposal would become part of the Sensoris data model because of their licensing approach
    • Prokop shows an architecture picture (that includes GENIVI and AGL as a kind of "technology choices" inside of vehicle.  Explanation was made about GENIVI Alliance actual scope and current projects.)
    • Sensoris main purpose is to make sure that OEMs are not delivering different data, they should deliver the same data
    • Prokop said it is out of scope of Sensoris to describe the system and software architecture, however they care about the "how" (e.g. protocols) to some extent
    • Gerald: motivation for having a common data model in Sensoris is for instance the wipers model (e.g. 3 bits on the CAN bus)
    • Gunnar: Gerald had a quite long discussion with Prokop about how OEMs provide the data, Sensoris does not care about the software architecture OEMs will use, more that the data that comes out is according to some shared standard (so that 3rd party developers can engage with more than one OEM).
    • Gunnar: it seems they would reuse whatever architecture is defined by GENIVI
    • Philippe: IMHO we should not fight for having an aligment of the data models, we could likely live with some duplicated representation for the data that overlap between Sensoris and VSS
    • Benjamin: agreed
    • discussion follows on GENVIVI scope vs Sensoris scope, VSS could be considered upstream w.r.t. Sensoris for the data defined in both projects
    • another meeting will be scheduled in 4-week time, we need to do our gap analysis between Sensoris and VSS first
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-35
          will be added to the new sprint
    • Scrum review
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-42
        done
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-47
        done
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-31
        kept in the backlog, can be activated whenever Don provides us with an update on the OCF Automotive group work
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-42
        done,
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-52
        created, we might be interested in knowing more about the OCF cloud services framework in the future when we start looking at the available technologies for the framework
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-40
        done
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-50
        done, Gerald provided an updated version of the CCS block-diagram highlighting GENIVI components rather than Autosar framework
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-33
        done
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-35
        added to the sprint, new Jira ticket created
        Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-53
          with blocking link added
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-38
        updated
        • Gerald: IMHO ISO ExVe is not too exciting, performing a gap analysis between ExVe is to be further discussed with Kevin,
        • ticket is reassigned to Kevin to determine whether it is worth GENIVI buys the access to the specs from ANSI/ISO,
        • Gunnar: then we should likely check the architecture proposed by ISO ExVe can be filled by some components we have identified in the GENIVI communication framework
    • Review of remaining items related to Analysis epic in the backlog
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-3
        actually done with the various surveys completed
      • tickets to be added to the next Sprint starting on 10 September:
        • Jira
          serverJIRA
          serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
          keyVCS-4
        • Jira
          serverJIRA
          serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
          keyVCS-5
        • Jira
          serverJIRA
          serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
          keyVCS-6
        • Jira
          serverJIRA
          serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
          keyVCS-7
        • Jira
          serverJIRA
          serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
          keyVCS-24
          inputs for this work item will be given by the various gap analysis we have identified
    • Gap analysis deliverable
      • Jira
        serverJIRA
        serverId121ddff2-c571-320f-9e4d-d5b9371533bd
        keyVCS-48
        updated with subtasks for Kevin, Gunnar, Gerald, Guru, Benjamin, Daniel for describing their contribution to the deliverable, please refer to the GAP analysis outline draft

...