Page History

...

• discussion starts on the EV data access requirements
  • /TODO/ TBD (Benjamin ?) to compare Geotab doc on EV data requirements and the content of the data bundles wiki page

  • Philippe: brings clarification on his expectation concerning data categories vs EV data requirements sent by Geotab

• discussion conrinues on the definition of data bundles as described in the wiki page previously named Data Bundles
  • Both Gunnar and Benjamin agree to rename the page as Data Categories

• Gunnar: in his opinion, it is now important to start looking into the format for message values

• Gunnar shows the wiki page Value measurement formats he drafted
  
  • review of the definition section of this proposal
  • Benjamin: agrees with the definition of a signal
  • Benjamin: for the record item, he would rather use observation or measurement
  • discussion of examples for a record, with timestamp attached and possible additional information
  • there is the special use case of streaming where you have a continuous connection: look at the stream item
• discussion continues on data format requirements for the different types of signals
• wiki page updated online by Gunnar, look at Value measurement formats

Second call

• /TODO/ all CCS participants to review the Geotab document on EV data access requirements
  • Philippe reminds this TODO to participants, Kevin will look at Geotab document this week
• /TODO/ Rex to review the Adaptive Autosar signal-to-service specifications
  • Philippe asks Keith whether he could provide an overview of the signal-to-service specifications
  • Keith: will do, Jira ticket created for tracking
• Keith was possible to join today after a long period of overlapping between CCS call and other calls
• Kevin: for the sake of synchronizing Keith with the CCS work, he presents the CCS PoC as described in CCS Proof-Of-Concept - Work Breakdown Structure
• Keith: asks how we can get the gps position of a fleet of cars using the communication infrastructure proposed in the poc
• Kevin V / Philippe: we might have different variants of the poc depending on how we simulate the vehicle data or whether we use existing devices like the Geotab Go device if we want to connect to actual cars
• Philippe: for the vehicle simulation, two options have been discussed in the AASIG project which is also working on a poc: either using the vehicle simulator published by JLR on GENIVI gitub (genivi-vehicle-simulator repository) or using opends
• Keith: indicates that LGE Labs in the Silicon Valley have also a vehicle simulatorr-
• Philippe: although we might start with laptops as execution targets for the poc, we might switch to automotive boards for the in-vehicle segment of the poc in the future, FYI Renesas has set up a lava-based test farm (with R-Car boards) to build and run the GENIVI CI process, we could use the test farm to simulate the vehicle segment
• Keith: FYI Adaptive Autosar has decommissionned their test farm and runs the CI process on qemu only

...