2023-01-24

Tech Charter status
- Spec and PoC part aligned
- licensing topics remaining
- next meeting Friday - just to finalize it
Way forward
- COVESA to continue with VehicleAPI (northbound) without formal AUTOSAR involvement.
- Joint part to be continued at earliest in March (if a license agreement exists)
Remaining work until meeting Feb 3rd
- assumed that the meeting the 3rd will still take place
What to do after Feb 3rd
- COVESA to make our own charter, by removing parts depending on AUTOSAR
- Figure out requirements, document
- There is a proposal from Ulf
  - Ulf: We can use as base, possibly submit to AUTOSAR
- Ted: But why shall we start.
- Erik:
  - Continue with this slot after Feb 3rd?
  - Github Repo so we can start with Charter+API?
Proposal: Continue discussing COVESA vehicle API charter Feb 7th (same slot)

2023-01-17

Charter status
- Spec part aligned
- PoC part to be discussed by WG Cloud on Thursday
What to do after charter
- Work model - joint effort vs split responsibilities
- Document format (charter, specs)
- Where to store - create Git repo
- Who wants to drive what - what volunteers do we have for specs, PoCs and so on.
  - BMW and Renesas interest
  - We might have a lot of PoC setups, then we need to see where there is interest for collaboration.
Adaptive AUTOSAR simulator: https://github.com/langroodi/Adaptive-AUTOSAR
Adnan: Do we have any additional questions to AUTOSAR, if not we can continue defining north bound
- How will deployment scenarios look like? Can AUTOSAR provide info? Then we can continue developm, wo AUTOSAR involvement if needed.
Stephen: Focus next meeting on who to get going?!
Has Ford/MBition any opinion on what need to exist in the interface

Erik presented an idea on how the charter could be extended to be more explicit on deliveries - necessary to be able to create roadmap
Erik has been in contact with Nadym Salem to set up a meeting with Sami Kekki and others from the AUTOSAR Cloud WG to align on charter before meeting Dec 16th, no response from Sami yet
Meeting decision to increase depth in charter, but not include all from shown presentation
Two possible setup of "Vehicle API" must be included
- Where the "Vehicle API" is used inside AUTOSAR (Interface between AUTOSAR and Linux/Cloud may use something completely different)
- Where the "Vehicle API" is used between AUTOSAR and Linux
Erik to update draft charter, possibly ready Wednesday or Thursday
Adnan and others to review
Discussion to continue next Tuesday